|
A Feynman sprinkler, also referred to as a Feynman inverse sprinkler or as a reverse sprinkler, is a sprinkler-like device which is submerged in a tank and made to suck in the surrounding fluid. The question of how such a device would turn was the subject of an intense and remarkably long-lived debate. A regular sprinkler has nozzles arranged at angles on a freely rotating wheel such that when water is pumped out of them, the resulting jets cause the wheel to rotate; both a Catherine wheel and the aeolipile ("Hero engine") work on the same principle. A "reverse" or "inverse" sprinkler would operate by aspirating the surrounding fluid instead. The problem is now commonly associated with theoretical physicist Richard Feynman, who mentions it in his bestselling memoirs ''Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!'' The problem did not originate with Feynman, nor did he publish a solution to it. == History == The first documented treatment of the problem is in chapter III, section III of Ernst Mach's textbook ''The Science of Mechanics'', first published in 1883.〔Ernst Mach, (''Die Mechanik in Ihrer Entwicklung Historisch-Kritisch Dargerstellt'' ), (Leipzig: Brockhaus, 1883). Available in English as (''The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account of its Development'' ), (Chicago: Open Court, 1919), 4th ed., pp. 299-301.〕 There, Mach argued that the device shows "no distinct rotation."〔Ernst Mach, (''The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account of its Development'' ), (Chicago: Open Court, 1919), 4th ed., p. 301.〕 In the early 1940s (and apparently without awareness of the earlier discussion by Mach), the problem began to circulate among members of the physics department at Princeton University, generating a lively debate. Richard Feynman, at the time a young graduate student at Princeton, became intrigued by the problem and eventually built a makeshift experiment within the facilities of the university's cyclotron laboratory. The experiment ended with the explosion of the glass carboy that he was using as part of his setup. In 1966, Feynman turned down an offer from the editor of ''Physics Teacher'' to discuss the problem in print and objected to it being called "Feynman's problem," pointing instead to the discussion of it in Mach's textbook.〔Richard P. Feynman, ''Perfectly Reasonable Deviations From the Beaten Track: The Letters of Richard P. Feynman'', ed. Michelle Feynman, (New York: Basic Books, 2006), pp. 209-211. ISBN 0-465-02371-1〕 The sprinkler problem attracted a great deal of attention after the incident was mentioned in ''Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!'', a book of autobiographical reminiscences published in 1985.〔Richard P. Feynman, ''Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!'', (Norton, New York, NY, 1985), pp. 63-65.〕 Feynman neither explained his understanding of the relevant physics, nor did he describe the results of the experiment. In an article written shortly after Feynman's death in 1988, John Wheeler, who had been his doctoral advisor at Princeton, revealed that the experiment at the cyclotron had shown “a little tremor as the pressure was first applied () but as the flow continued there was no reaction.” The sprinkler incident is also discussed in James Gleick's biography of Feynman, ''Genius,'' published in 1992, where Gleick claims that a sprinkler will not turn at all if made to suck in fluid.〔James Gleick, ''Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman'' (New York: Pantheon, 1992), pp. 106-108.〕 In 2005, physicist Edward C. Creutz (who was in charge of the Princeton cyclotron at the time of the incident) revealed in print that he had assisted Feynman in setting up his experiment and that, when pressure was applied to force water out of the carboy through the sprinkler head, 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Feynman sprinkler」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|